Engineering Checklist

This checklist is intended for researchers, project directors and evaluators, grant writers, and funding organizations addressing the development of technologies and related products, services, infrastructures, or processes. It provides a set of key questions for incorporating sex, gender and intersectional analyses into engineering—as a basis for developing Gendered Innovations. As such, it complements and should be read in conjunction with the methodology described in Engineering Innovation Processes. For product design, see Intersectional Design.

Key Questions

(A) Determining the Relevance of Sex

  • 2. Are there basic anatomical and physiological differences between women, and men, and non-binary individuals that should be considered (e.g., in height, strength, range of motion, etc.)? (see Term: Sex; see Methods: Analyzing Sex; Rethinking Standards and Reference Models)
  • 3. Are there further anatomical and physiological differences between women and men that should be considered (e.g. in vision, hearing, voice pitch, sense of touch, smell, and taste, pro-prioceptors, muscular tension, temperature perception, etc.)?

(B) Determining the Relevance of Gender and Other Intersectional Factors

  • 4. What are the potential application areas of the technology (e.g., professional life, leisure activities, home, etc.)? Do these contexts suggest different patterns of use by different groups of potential consumers? See Term: Gender; see Methods: Analyzing Gender; Intersectional Approaches.
  • 5. Might different groups of potential consumers (e.g., non-binary individuals, women, or men, old or young, etc.) have different expectations regarding the interface? Do certain features of previous innovations reinforce existing gender inequalities, gender norms, or stereotypes? (see Reformulating Research Questions; Participatory Research and Design)
  • 6. Might different groups of potential consumers have different expectations regarding the exterior design?
  • 7. Might different groups of potential consumers have different expectations regarding the features and functions?
  • 8. Is it more cost-effective to tailor the technology to specific groups at early development stages or could it be inexpensively adapted in post-development?
  • 9. Is there a risk of stereotyping or offending potential consumers through the exterior design (e.g., imposing role models, avatars, different forms of sexism, or racism etc.)?
  • 10. Is there a risk of excluding certain groups (e.g., the elderly) through the technology design?
  • 11. Would certain configurations reinforce existing social roles (e.g., gender segregation in the work force; men associated with engineering and women with domestic technologies, for example)?
  • 12. On the basis of the above, what are the relevant sex, gender, or intersectional variables for your business, and what do you need to know that you do not currently know or understand concerning these factors?

(C) Determining the Tools Required

  • 13. Is it possible and/or necessary to establish a usability lab or to run ergonomic tests? What additional tools might you use for monitoring (questionnaires, workshops, etc.)?
  • 14. Have you ensured diversity within test groups (in terms of age, sex, gender identity, ethnicity, height, etc.)?

(D) Determining the Potential for Innovation

  • 15. Can you think of any additional customer groups or application areas for your technology?
  • 16. How much research would be necessary to identify those groups/markets?
  • 17. Is your business model missing potential opportunities by not addressing sex, gender, or intersectional factors sufficiently? Where might analyzing these factors open up new business opportunities through Gendered Innovation?

(E) Procuring Sex and Gender Expertise

  • 18. Have you identified the particular gender or other types of expertise you require?
  • 19. Do your internal and external teams include the needed gender expertise? If not, what efforts are your teams making to bring in gender specialists?
  • 20. Do members of the target group(s) have particular expertise relevant to developing or applying the technology that should be incorporated into the innovation process?
  • 21. What efforts is your team making to ensure that the diverse expertise, interests and needs of the target groups are incorporated into the design and development of the product? (see Co-Creation & Participatory Research)
  • 22. Do certain groups hold knowledge (e.g., because of gendered or age-specific divisions of labor) with the potential to prevent unwanted outcomes, such as increased social inequalities or environmental damage?
  • 23. What efforts is your team making to ensure that it learns from the inputs of external expertise concerning sex, gender, and intersectional analyses, and builds relevant capabilities in-house?
  • 24. Does your team understand how to incorporate gender expert knowledge and innovation criteria into existing design, engineering and quality methods such as Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA), or Six Sigma?

Works Cited

This Checklist is based on the Fraunhofer - project "Discover Gender", which was funded from the German Ministry for Research from 2004-2006. See:

Bührer, S., & Schraudner, M. (Eds.) (2006). Wie können Gender-Aspekte in Forschungsvorhaben erkannt und bewertet werden? Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Verlag.

Schraudner, M. (2010). Fraunhofer’s DiscoverGender Research Findings. In Spritzley, A.,Ohlausen, P., Sprath, D., (Eds.), The Innovation Potential of Diversity: Practical Examples for the Innovation Management, pp. 169–185. Berlin: Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung.

See also:

Vinnova, What is Norm-Critical Innovation?

Gendered Innovations, Intersectional Design.






double logo double logo double logo


TermsSite Map